Professional Game Reviewers, stop reviewing games!
Mike "I hate everyone" Apps

Professional game reviewer, I’m sure it’s something most of the people reading this wish they had as a job. The problem however, with most of the professional game writers out there seems to be that they don’t care about you (gamers) anymore. What do I mean exactly? Basically, game reviewers these days have reverted to practices such as giving favorable reviews to game genres they enjoy and giving bad reviews to games from genres they dislike or have grown tired of, and they do a pore job of hiding. In short, game reviewers have made game ranking information all but worthless.
First of all, expanding the earlier point, how is it that constantly RPGs using the time tested formula that loads of gamers love get bashed on, while over-hyped, derivative shooting games get amazing ratings and no mention is made of how these games do nothing new for the genre. I’m sorry folks, but Gears of War using a chainsaw isn’t ground-breaking. This practice is enough to drive a gamer mad. You see it in most console RPG reviews, “typical console RPG”, but where the heck is the “typical shooter” tag? From the sales of big name franchises we can see that people like familiarity, and familiarity is something both of these genres do very well, new games being easy to pick up and play for fans of the franchise. However, I would contend that even the most boring RPG does more varied things than even the greatest shooter. Romancing Saga, a so-so RPG, does a lot more varied things with the RPG formula than say Halo 2 does with the shooter formula. I mean, you shoot things, possibly drive vehicles, possible have specially powers, and there may or may not be an interesting story, that about boils down all shooters. I guess you have to be named Dragon Quest or Final Fantasy to escape the meaningless “typical console RPG label” (and Dragon Quest is certainly a series that doesn’t change much). Typical isn’t bad reviewers, especially if it as a good story, and as is most important in games, is fun.
Secondly, its time to axe the graphics rating for games, completely. In an age where the graphics ability varies widely from the various consoles and portable consoles, it simply has no meaning anymore. We all know it doesn’t mean “is this game horrible to look at” and rather means “how much shadows and lighting effects does it throw at you at once”. Don’t be fooled here, I love shadow and lighting effects as much as the next person, but some of the best games out there can be some of the least graphically impressive. Take the Legend of Zelda, Twilight Princess for example. I’ve seen some reviewers bash it because its graphics are basically Gamecube quality graphics with little improvement, to which I would reply, so what? Was there something wrong with the last generation of graphics? It certain doesn’t seem like it when I’m playing Wind Waker or Resident Evil 4. So now games are suddenly bad if they show up on the next-gen with last-gen graphics? I for one would still play another Zelda game that looks like Ocarina of Time.
My point in all this ranting is that the graphics scale in games review is supposed to be about how nice and unobtrusive a games graphics are, not how technically advanced they are. Since I see now way of reviewers rating games not on how advanced the graphics are the scale needs to be axed completely. I mean, if they made games that much better, why the heck are more people enjoying the Nintendo DS then are enjoying the PSP?
Finally, game reviewers need to escape the hype machine. The majority of highly hyped games theses days end up averaging ratings in the 9 range, and a lot of them simply don’t deserve it. Gears of War? I’m sure it’s a lot of fun, but from everything I’ve heard and seen it’s simply not that amazing. Halo? Please, the Marathon games were better. Final Fantasy 8? Wooped by any other game in the series in terms of fun. The Grand Theft Auto Series? Sorry the gameplay just isn’t that deep. None of super-hyped games are usually bad, but for Christ sakes they’re not all 9’s. Too often do reviewers get caught in the hype and forget that there simply isn’t as much greatness there as thought. Frankly, the only truly amazing fun shooter I’ve played since Goldeneye is Halo 2, so some of these reviewers are lying.
Alright I think I’ve complained enough. I will admit that a lot of my gripes here are my opinions and some people may not agree with, but I think we can all agree that game reviews these days are flawed. Something has to be wrong when games with clear flaws like Gears of War and F.E.A.R. are getting reviews putting them in the range of classics like Ocarina of Time and Golden Eye. Until things improve, gamers are going to have to fend for themselves, or try and find ways of seeing through over hyped graphics happy reviewers.






Hello BDPEers. 


